The food travel debate is inevitably intertwined between economic interests and environmental concerns. While food is traveling because transport has become so cheap in a world of globalization, the manner by which food is being carried is not doing the natural environment any favors. The question is whether to meet human food demand or to reduce pollution? Linking food with transportation is big business. The ability to transport food cheaply has given rise to booming business regarding freight by land, sea and air. As the population continues to grow, so does the demand for food. Nowadays, all kinds of food may be carried long distances from producing regions to consumer markets in a matter of weeks, days or even hours. Such is a win-win trade practice, benefitting both sellers who can help create more valuable jobs and buyers who can help supply consumers with more food varieties at more affordable prices. At this point, commercial globalization seems to be positive at its best, justifying in part why foods need to travel thousands of miles. Of course, the negative side is about pollution. Despite the fact that buying and selling foods beyond borders may bolster economic relationships, the environmental impact of transportation is just too great to ignore. Big trucks, huge ships and giant airplanes that are used to carry foods use fossil fuels. Fuel burning has become so excessive that environmentalists behind a green cloak are calling on policy makers to effectively reduce pollution, or else. The warning is certainly not groundless, considering that pollution from transportation accounts for no small a part of those emissions which are believed to generate greenhouse effects that eventually cause the Earths climate to change. Obviously, the longer the distance food travels, the fuel consumption of the transportation vessels will also be greater, and no doubt the more serious the global warming. In view of both the positive side and negative side about long-distance food transportation, there seems no easy answer to the question. Nevertheless, it is up to consumers to make choices, knowing where food comes from. Buying local produce not only supports local farmers but also provides dinner tables with the freshest and most nutrient-packed options.
食品旅游的争论不可避免地与经济利益和环境问题相互交织在一起。食物是旅行，因为在全球化的世界中，运输变得如此便宜，食物被携带的方式并不是在自然环境中做任何帮助。问题是，是否满足人类的食物需求或减少污染？与交通运输是大企业。运输食品便宜的能力已经引起了蓬勃发展的业务，货运的土地，海洋和空气。随着人口的不断增长，对食品的需求也在不断增长。如今，各种食品可能会在几周、几天甚至几小时的时间里，从生产地区到消费市场的距离很长。这是一个双赢的贸易实践，受益的卖家可以帮助创造更多有价值的工作，购房人可以帮助消费者提供更多的食物品种更实惠的价格。在这一点上，商业全球化似乎正处于最佳状态，部分原因是食物需要旅行数千英里。当然，负面的一面是关于污染。尽管事实上，购买和销售超出国界的食品可能会促进经济关系，对环境的影响的运输是太大了不容忽视。大型卡车，大型船舶和巨型飞机，用于携带食物使用化石燃料。燃料燃烧已经变得如此的过度，环保主义者背后的绿色外衣，呼吁政策制定者，有效地减少污染，否则。警告当然不是毫无根据的，因为污染来自交通账户，因为这些污染物的排放量不小，这些排放物被认为是产生温室效应，最终导致地球气候变化的原因之一。显然，长途食品旅行的时间越长，运输船的燃料消耗量也就越大，也无疑更严重的全球变暖。从正面和负面的角度来看，长途食品运输，似乎没有一个简单的答案的问题。尽管如此，它还是取决于消费者做出选择，知道食物来自哪里。购买本地产品不仅支持当地的农民也为餐桌上最新鲜，最营养的选择。