In the past twenty years, the amount of traffic on the roads has greatly increased, and this has led to many problems with traffic jams and pollution in inner city areas. Some countries have limited the use of cars in the inner city by charging fees or restricting the days on which people can drive into the city. This approach has some disadvantages but, on the whole, it is a good solution to the problem of inner city traffic. Restricting car traffic in the city can make it very difficult for some people to do their daily work. For example, moving quickly to meetings is very important for businessmen, and if they have no car this could create problems for them. In addition, it is important for disabled people or for families with young children to access city services and they should be able to drive their cars to the places where they need to go. Limiting the use of cars could create real inconvenience for some citizens. However, there are many advantages to this idea. Firstly, it greatly reduces inner city pollution, both by reducing the number of cars and by encouraging the use of public transport. This reduction in pollution benefits everyone who lives and works in the city. Secondly, it decreases traffic congestion and actually makes it easier to move around the city. Thus, businessmen may find it quicker to get to their meetings and to visit other locations either by tax, by bus or by rail transport.
在过去的二十年里，道路的交通量已大大增加，这导致了许多问题，交通拥堵和污染的城市地区。一些国家在城市里使用汽车，通过收取费用或限制人们可以开车到城市的日子。这种方法存在一定的不足，但总体上是解决城市内部交通问题的一个很好的解决办法。限制城市的交通，让一些人很难做日常工作。举例来说，快速的会议是非常重要的商人，如果他们没有车，这可以为他们创造问题。此外，重要的是为残疾人士或家庭提供青少年儿童访问城市服务，他们应该能够驾驶他们的车到他们需要去的地方。限制汽车的使用可能给一些市民带来不便。然而，这一想法有许多优点。首先，它极大地减少了城市污染，减少了汽车的数量，鼓励了公共交通的使用。这减少污染对每个人生活和工作的城市。其次，它减少交通拥堵，实际上使得它更容易在城市周围移动。因此，商人可能会发现它更快地获得他们的会议，并访问其他地点，无论是由税收，由巴士或铁路运输。